Thomas v. Hartford Casualty Insurance
This text of 647 F. App'x 224 (Thomas v. Hartford Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Bruce B. Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to remand to state court and granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss this action seeking the recovery of benefits under insurance policies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co., No. 3:15-cv-01604-RBH, 2015 WL 7313864 (D.S.C. Nov. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument-would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
647 F. App'x 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-hartford-casualty-insurance-ca4-2016.