Thomas v. Hall

Fourth Circuit

Thomas v. Hall

126 F. App'x 104

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 13, 2005·No. No. 04-2102·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Albert Thomas, Jr. appeals the district court’s order awarding summary judgment to defendants and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Thomas v. Hall, No. CA-03-28-40-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2004). We grant Thomas’s motion to supplement his informal brief and deny his motion to appoint appellate counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Albert Thomas, Jr. appeals the district court’s order awarding summary judgment to defendants and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Thomas v. Hall, No. CA-03-28-40-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2004). We grant Thomas’s motion to supplement his informal brief and deny his motion to appoint appellate counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Thomas v. Hall, 126 F. App'x 104 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

126 F. App'x 104 (Thomas v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related