Thomas v. Giddins

295 A.D.2d 523, 744 N.Y.S.2d 856, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6404

Opinion

—In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father [524] appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Dounias, J.), entered December 28, 2001, which denied his objections to an order of the same court, entered October 24, 2001 (Fields-Ferraro, H.E.), denying, without a hearing, his application for downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The father failed to establish a change in circumstances sufficient to warrant downward modification of his child support obligation (see Matter of Kotlyar v Burshtein, 268 AD2d 433). The father’s remaining contentions are not properly before this Court (see Matter of Werner v Werner, 130 AD2d 754). Santucci, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Giddins, 295 A.D.2d 523, 744 N.Y.S.2d 856, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6404 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

295 A.D.2d 523 (Thomas v. Giddins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Werner v. Werner
130 A.D.2d 754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Kotlyar v. Burshtein
268 A.D.2d 433 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)