Thomas v. Gate City Insurance

222 N.C. 754
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 25, 1942·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tbe right of action, if any, alleged in tbe complaint accrues to tbe mother of deceased. Tbe plaintiff has no interest or estate therein. He is not tbe real party in interest and has no right to maintain tbe action. C. S., 446; Rental Co. v. Justice, 211 N. C., 54, 188 S. E., 609.

Furthermore, tbe appeal is dismissable for failure of tbe record to show tbe organization of tbe court below. Rule 19; Brown v. Johnson, 201 N. C., 807, 178 S. E., 570.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Gate City Insurance, 222 N.C. 754 (N.C. 1942).

222 N.C. 754 (Thomas v. Gate City Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Teague v. Teague Furniture Co.
161 S.E. 530 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Choate Rental Co. v. Justice
188 S.E. 609 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
Brown v. . Johnson
178 S.E. 570 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)