Thomas v. Gartner
57 N.W. 188, 97 Mich. 608
Opinion
An order to show cause is denied. Mandamus is not a proper remedy to review an appealable order in a chancery case; nor is their regularity of the appointment of a receiver under a judgment creditor’s bill any [609] reason for the defendants objecting to an examination concerning their property and effects. Howard v. Palmer, Walk. Ch. 391.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas v. Gartner, 57 N.W. 188, 97 Mich. 608 (Mich. 1893).
57 N.W. 188 (Thomas v. Gartner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. Michigan State Telephone Co.
200 N.W. 749 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1924)
Nichol v. Murphy
108 N.W. 704 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1906)
Mardian v. Wayne Circuit Judge
76 N.W. 497 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1898)