Thomas v. Frederick County Government

469 F. App'x 213
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 19, 2012
DocketNo. 11-2261
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 469 F. App'x 213 (Thomas v. Frederick County Government) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Frederick County Government, 469 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Andre Thomas appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Frederick Cnty. Gov’t, No. 1:11-cv-02907-WDQ (D.Md. Oct. 25, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ballesteros v. Pocta, Esq.
E.D. Virginia, 2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
469 F. App'x 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-frederick-county-government-ca4-2012.