Thomas v. Frederick County Government

Fourth Circuit

Thomas v. Frederick County Government

469 F. App'x 213

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2012·No. No. 11-2261·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Andre Thomas appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Frederick Cnty. Gov’t, No. 1:11-cv-02907-WDQ (D.Md. Oct. 25, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Andre Thomas appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Frederick Cnty. Gov’t, No. 1:11-cv-02907-WDQ (D.Md. Oct. 25, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Thomas v. Frederick County Government, 469 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

469 F. App'x 213 (Thomas v. Frederick County Government) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related