Thomas v. Frankhouser

Superior Court of Delaware

Thomas v. Frankhouser

90 A. 465, 28 Del. 21, 5 Boyce 21, 1914 Del. LEXIS 3

DecidedMay 6, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 90 A. 465 (Thomas v. Frankhouser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. Frankhouser, 90 A. 465, 28 Del. 21, 5 Boyce 21, 1914 Del. LEXIS 3 (Del. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Pennewill, C. J.,

announcing the decision of the court:

The affidavit of defense, it seems to us, alleges a distinct defense. It would be difficult sometimes to state anything more definite than is stated in this affidavit. We think it is sufficient under the decisions of our courts which have held the word “payment” to be sufficient in such an affidavit.

The motion for judgment notwithstanding the affidavit of defense is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennewill, C. J.,

announcing the decision of the court:

The affidavit of defense, it seems to us, alleges a distinct defense. It would be difficult sometimes to state anything more definite than is stated in this affidavit. We think it is sufficient under the decisions of our courts which have held the word “payment” to be sufficient in such an affidavit.

The motion for judgment notwithstanding the affidavit of defense is refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 A. 465, 28 Del. 21, 5 Boyce 21, 1914 Del. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-frankhouser-delsuperct-1914.