Thomas v. Florida Parole Commission

950 So. 2d 543, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4208, 2007 WL 837138
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 21, 2007·No. No. 4D07-123·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from an order denying appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus/habeas corpus, appellee Florida Parole Commission concedes that the trial court erred in ruling on the petition before waiting twenty days to permit appellant to file a reply to appellee’s response. See Bard v. Wolson, 687 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We agree and reverse for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

STONE, WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Florida Parole Commission, 950 So. 2d 543, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4208, 2007 WL 837138 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

950 So. 2d 543 (Thomas v. Florida Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bard v. Wolson
687 So. 2d 254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)