Thomas v. Florida Parole Commission

827 So. 2d 358, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14293, 2002 WL 31202677
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 4, 2002
DocketNo. 1D01-4308
StatusPublished

This text of 827 So. 2d 358 (Thomas v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Florida Parole Commission, 827 So. 2d 358, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14293, 2002 WL 31202677 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because this Court is not authorized to grant a belated appeal in a civil proceeding, we reverse as an abuse of discretion the trial court’s denial of the Appellant’s motion to vacate brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b), and [359]*359remand the matter to the trial court. See Lyons v. State, 797 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

ALLEN, C.J., DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lyons v. State
797 So. 2d 1271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
827 So. 2d 358, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14293, 2002 WL 31202677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-2002.