Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Thomas v. Florida Department of Corrections

Thomas v. Florida Department of Corrections

881 So. 2d 1188, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13326, 2004 WL 1969569
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 8, 2004
DocketNo. 1D03-3400
StatusPublished

This text of 881 So. 2d 1188 (Thomas v. Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Florida Department of Corrections, 881 So. 2d 1188, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13326, 2004 WL 1969569 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The circuit court should have considered appellant’s Motion for Reconsideration as a Motion to Amend the Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Given that the motion set forth additional facts that refuted the factual conclusions reached by the court in denying the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, such motion should have been granted. See Cason v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 819 So.2d 1012, 1013 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Hall v. Key, 476 So.2d 787, 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

ERVIN, BOOTH, and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. Key
476 So. 2d 787 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Cason v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N
819 So. 2d 1012 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
881 So. 2d 1188, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13326, 2004 WL 1969569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-florida-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2004.