Thomas v. First National Bank of Tampa
219 So. 2d 688, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2485
Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 19, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is, therefore, denied.
The Petition for attorney’s fee is also denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas v. First National Bank of Tampa, 219 So. 2d 688, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2485 (Fla. 1969).
219 So. 2d 688 (Thomas v. First National Bank of Tampa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. Howard Hall Company
219 So. 2d 688 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)