Thomas v. First National Bank of Tampa

219 So. 2d 688, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2485
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 5, 1969
DocketNo. 37923
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 219 So. 2d 688 (Thomas v. First National Bank of Tampa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. First National Bank of Tampa, 219 So. 2d 688, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2485 (Fla. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 19, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The Petition for attorney’s fee is also denied.

ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur. ERVIN, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. Howard Hall Company
219 So. 2d 688 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 So. 2d 688, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-first-national-bank-of-tampa-fla-1969.