Thomas v. Feaster

22 Ind. 356
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1864
StatusPublished

This text of 22 Ind. 356 (Thomas v. Feaster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Feaster, 22 Ind. 356 (Ind. 1864).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant sued the appellee to recover certain real estate, to which his pleadings showed he claimed title by virtue of a judgment, execution, sheriff’s sale, and deed. It appears the judgment was recorded in January, [357]*3571859, in the Common Pleas Court, upon confession, on warrant of attorney, for 1100 dollars.

A. W. Subbard, Geo. G. Clark, and L. § W. 0. Sexton, for the appellant. J. S. Seobey, for the appellee.

At that term the Common Pleas had no jurisdiction to render judgment for more than a 1000 dollars. The demurrer to the complaint should have been sustained. Marsh et al. v. Sherman, 12 Ind. 358; Shaw v. Gallagher, 8 id. 252; Armstrong v. Jackson, 1 Blackf. 210.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armstrong v. Jackson
1 Blackf. 210 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1822)
Marsh v. Sherman
12 Ind. 358 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1859)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Ind. 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-feaster-ind-1864.