Thomas v. E. L. Thompson Co.
166 So. 2d 443, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2579
Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 14, 1964.
. We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas v. E. L. Thompson Co., 166 So. 2d 443, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2579 (Fla. 1964).
166 So. 2d 443 (Thomas v. E. L. Thompson Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. Giuliano
166 So. 2d 443 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)