Thomas v. E. L. Thompson Co.

166 So. 2d 443, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2579
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 22, 1964
DocketNo. 33447
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 So. 2d 443 (Thomas v. E. L. Thompson Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. E. L. Thompson Co., 166 So. 2d 443, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2579 (Fla. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 14, 1964.

. We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. Giuliano
166 So. 2d 443 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 So. 2d 443, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-e-l-thompson-co-fla-1964.