Thomas v. Duke University

Fourth Circuit

Thomas v. Duke University

512 F. App'x 312

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2013·No. No. 12-2563·Published

Opinion

[313] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sharon Thomas appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaint alleging discriminatory hiring practices and denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Thomas leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Duke Univ., No. 3:11-cv-00387, 2012 WL 5985504 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[313] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sharon Thomas appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaint alleging discriminatory hiring practices and denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Thomas leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Duke Univ., No. 3:11-cv-00387, 2012 WL 5985504 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Thomas v. Duke University, 512 F. App'x 312 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

512 F. App'x 312 (Thomas v. Duke University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.