Thomas v. Douglass

2 Johns. Cas. 226
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1801·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant had time to plead until the second day of the term, and the order must be construed as including that day; so that the default could no be entered on that day.(a) Again, the venue was changed, and notice thereof given before the time for pleading had expired. It [226] was then incumbent on the plaintiff to alter the declaration on file, and the copy delivered accordingly, or file and deliver a new declaration. This not having been done, the judgment is, on this ground also, irregular, and must be set aside.(b)

Rule granted.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Douglass, 2 Johns. Cas. 226 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1801).

2 Johns. Cas. 226 (Thomas v. Douglass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sugerman v. Jacobs
160 A.D. 411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Braseth v. County of Bottineau
100 N.W. 1082 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1904)
Conway v. Smith Mercantile Co.
49 L.R.A. 201 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1896)