Thomas v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Thomas v. Director of Revenue

223 S.W.3d 178, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 750

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 15, 2007·No. ED 88796·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Thomas (“Thomas”) appeals from a judgment in the Circuit Court of St. Charles County denying his application for hardship driving privileges for lack of jurisdiction. Thomas contends that the trial court erred in dismissing his petition on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction because he was not statutorily ineligible for a hardship license.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Thomas (“Thomas”) appeals from a judgment in the Circuit Court of St. Charles County denying his application for hardship driving privileges for lack of jurisdiction. Thomas contends that the trial court erred in dismissing his petition on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction because he was not statutorily ineligible for a hardship license.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Thomas v. Director of Revenue, 223 S.W.3d 178, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 750 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

223 S.W.3d 178 (Thomas v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related