Thomas v. Dick Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Thomas v. Dick Corp.

146 F. App'x 646

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 21, 2005

DocketNo. 05-1492

StatusPublished

This text of 146 F. App'x 646 (Thomas v. Dick Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. Dick Corp., 146 F. App'x 646 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Janie K. Thomas and Orville Thomas appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their tort action and denying their motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Thomas v. Dick Corp., No. CA-04-1205 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 24 and Mar. 31, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Janie K. Thomas and Orville Thomas appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their tort action and denying their motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Thomas v. Dick Corp., No. CA-04-1205 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 24 and Mar. 31, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 F. App'x 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-dick-corp-ca4-2005.