Thomas v. Cromer
135 So. 2d 420
This text of 135 So. 2d 420 (Thomas v. Cromer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thomas v. Cromer, 135 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 1961).
Opinion
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument, and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the petition is [421]*421without merit. Therefore the writ must be and is hereby discharged, Fla.App., 124 So.2d 36.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cromer v. Thomas
124 So. 2d 36 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 So. 2d 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-cromer-fla-1961.