Thomas v. Cromer

Supreme Court of Florida

Thomas v. Cromer

135 So. 2d 420

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 29, 1961·No. No. 31047·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument, and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the petition is [421]*421without merit. Therefore the writ must be and is hereby discharged, Fla.App., 124 So.2d 36.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and HOBSON, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument, and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the petition is [421]*421without merit. Therefore the writ must be and is hereby discharged, Fla.App., 124 So.2d 36.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and HOBSON, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Thomas v. Cromer, 135 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 1961).

Pincite

135 So. 2d 420 (Thomas v. Cromer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related