Thomas v. Crawford

166 S.E. 437, 175 Ga. 863, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 349
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 15, 1932
DocketNo. 9243
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 166 S.E. 437 (Thomas v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Crawford, 166 S.E. 437, 175 Ga. 863, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 349 (Ga. 1932).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The evidence demanded the finding that the levy made under the tax fi. fa. was excessive, and for that reason it was void. Any sale under a void levy is itself void. For that reason the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. Stark v. Cummings, 127 Ga. 107 (2) (56 S. E. 130); Williams v. Forman, 158 Ga. 89 (5), 90 (123 S. E. 20); Stowe v. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co., 161 Ga. 403 (131 S. E. 44); McDaniel v. Thomas, 162 Ga. 592 (133 S. E. 624); Davis v. Elliott, 163 Ga. 169 (2), 170 (135 S. E. 731). This is true notwithstanding the fact that fractional parts of the property levied on were first offered for sale, and finally the whole property was sold. McDaniel v. Thomas, supra. Under the evidence, the lowest valuation of the property that could have been found was $2500. The evidence on that subject ranged from that sum to the maximum, $4250. The amount of the tax due was $323.90. The property could have been subdivided for purposes of levy, since it consisted of four separate houses and lots. Other issues need not be decided, because the foregoing requires an affirmance of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LR SAMS COMPANY, INC. v. Hardy
126 S.E.2d 661 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)
Investors Finance Co. v. Hill
21 S.E.2d 220 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Marietta Realty & Development Co. v. Reynolds
5 S.E.2d 347 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Zugar v. Scarbrough
197 S.E. 854 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Wood v. Sommerfield
195 S.E. 428 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Long Realty Co. v. First National Bank
170 S.E. 485 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 S.E. 437, 175 Ga. 863, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-crawford-ga-1932.