Thomas v. Continental States Auto Club, Inc.

415 So. 2d 573, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 7518
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 26, 1982
DocketNo. 8424
StatusPublished

This text of 415 So. 2d 573 (Thomas v. Continental States Auto Club, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Continental States Auto Club, Inc., 415 So. 2d 573, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 7518 (La. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

SWIFT, Judge.

On May 23, 1980, Richard L. Thomas sustained injuries in an automobile accident for which he was hospitalized from May 26, 1980, through June 2, 1980. At the time plaintiff was a member of the Continental States Auto Club, Inc., (Continental) and as such he was insured by the latter’s underwriter, Manchester Life Insurance Company (Manchester), the defendants herein.

The policy contained a provision restricting recovery of benefits to injuries for which the insured was hospitalized within 48 hours after the accident causing same. Because Mr. Thomas admittedly was not hospitalized within 48 hours after the accident, Manchester refused to honor his claim.

In this suit judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $505 for medical and hospital benefits, but his demand for the statutory penalty and an attorney’s fee was rejected.

The trial judge ruled that the 48 hour exclusionary clause in the policy was an unreasonable restriction and against public policy, adopting the written reasons he had rendered in a similar case, Frank v. Continental States Auto Club, Inc., which was on appeal to this court at the time of the district court’s judgment. Our decision in that suit, adverse to the plaintiff’s contentions, was rendered on November 10, 1981, and a rehearing was denied January 4,1982. 407 So.2d 10 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1981). The supreme court refused an application for writs on February 12, 1982. 412 So.2d 76 (La.1982).

The principal issue in the present suit is the same as in Frank. Therefore, for the reasons stated in our decision in that prior case, we conclude the plaintiff is not entitled to any benefits under the policy.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed insofar as the awards to plaintiff of hospital and medical benefits, interest and court costs are concerned, but affirmed as to its denial of the statutory penalty and attorney’s fees. The suit is dismissed and the costs of court, including this appeal, are assessed to the plaintiff.

REVERSED AND RENDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frank v. Continental States Auto Club, Inc.
407 So. 2d 10 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
415 So. 2d 573, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 7518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-continental-states-auto-club-inc-lactapp-1982.