Thomas v. Consodine
434 F.2d 1052
This text of 434 F.2d 1052 (Thomas v. Consodine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thomas v. Consodine, 434 F.2d 1052 (3d Cir. 1970).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
After a careful review of the record and careful consideration of the parties’ briefs, we cannot subscribe to appellants’ contentions. The judgment will therefore be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
434 F.2d 1052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-consodine-ca3-1970.