Thomas v. Conrad

Ohio Supreme Court

Thomas v. Conrad

688 N.E.2d 270, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 349

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 5, 1998

Docket97-685

StatusPublished

This text of 688 N.E.2d 270 (Thomas v. Conrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. Conrad, 688 N.E.2d 270, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 349 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Montgomery App. Nos. 15873 and 15898. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of conflict by the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County. Upon consideration of the motion of amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers, to participate in oral argument currently scheduled for February 18, 1998,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, granted, and the Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers is to share the time allotted to appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery App. Nos. 15873 and 15898. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of conflict by the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County. Upon consideration of the motion of amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers, to participate in oral argument currently scheduled for February 18, 1998,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, granted, and the Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers is to share the time allotted to appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

688 N.E.2d 270, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-conrad-ohio-1998.