Thomas v. Commonwealth
This text of 487 S.W.2d 954 (Thomas v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was tried and convicted on all three counts of an indictment charging him with operating an automobile without the owner’s consent, KRS 433.220, maliciously burning the automobile, KRS 433.-030, and storehouse breaking, KRS 433.190.
The question is whether evidence of a prior conviction for armed robbery, KRS 433.140, was admissible under the rationale [955]*955of Cotton v. Commonwealth, Ky., 454 S.W. 2d 698, 701 (1970), for purposes of impeachment. The answer is yes.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
487 S.W.2d 954, 1972 Ky. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1972.