Thomas v. Clark

72 P. 1102, 66 Kan. 802, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 187

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This action was commenced to recover profits to arise from a business which was not begun, to be conducted by a corporation which was not formed; for rent of a building which was not erected, and for interest on an investment which was not made.

The trial court was blameless in refusing to permit an estimation of damages for the vanishing of plaintiff’s vision, and its judgment is affirmed.