Thomas v. City of New York
This text of 214 A.D.2d 724 (Thomas v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated January 20, 1994, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
During the early morning hours of January 31, 1989, an intruder entered a storage yard leased by the defendant Board of Education of the City of New York. The intruder shot and killed John Thomas, the night watchman. The plaintiff Lucy Ann Thomas subsequently commenced this wrongful death action, alleging that the defendants had negligently failed to secure the yard from intruders, and to take proper precautions to ensure the safety of employees. However, it is well settled that under these circumstances, the "provision of security against physical attacks by third parties * * * is a governmental function * * * and that no liability arises from the performance of such a function absent a special duty of protection” (Bonner v City of New York, 73 NY2d 930, 932). In the case before us, there is no evidence that the defendants owed a special duty of protection to the decedent, who himself [725]*725played an integral role in securing the premises from intruders. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (see, Bonner v City of New York, supra; Laura O. v State of New York, 202 AD2d 559; Lasker v City of New York, 194 AD2d 646; Wolff v City of New York, 190 AD2d 732). Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 A.D.2d 724, 625 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1995.