Thomas v. Cherryville National Bank
167 S.E. 66, 203 N.C. 864, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 438
This text of 167 S.E. 66 (Thomas v. Cherryville National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thomas v. Cherryville National Bank, 167 S.E. 66, 203 N.C. 864, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 438 (N.C. 1933).
Opinion
In addition to being somewhat involved, the plaintiff’s testimony falls short of establishing the contract as alleged, which would entitle him to recover for its breach. The case presents a simple question of the sufficiency of tbe evidence to warrant a recovery.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
167 S.E. 66, 203 N.C. 864, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-cherryville-national-bank-nc-1933.