Thomas v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2281
ALFRED T. THOMAS; RANDY L. THOMAS,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS; RAYMOND GIOVANELLI; MUFFET GARBER; MICHELE E. MORRIS; MARIA B. PETREA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00238)
Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 26, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alfred T. Thomas, Randy L. Thomas, Appellants Pro Se. Mark Weston Johnson, HELMS, MULLISS & WICKER, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Alfred T. Thomas and Randy L. Thomas appeal the district
court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissing
the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Thomas v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools, No. 3:06-cv-00238
(W.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2006). We deny Thomas’ motions to certify and
for sanctions, and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools (Thomas v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.