Thomas v. . Bysaner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Thomas v. . Bysaner

63 N.C. 131

DecidedJanuary 5, 1869

StatusPublished

This text of 63 N.C. 131 (Thomas v. . Bysaner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. . Bysaner, 63 N.C. 131 (N.C. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

The writ (Debt) was issued returnable to Spring Term, 1867, and at that Term the defendant prayed to have the advantage of the Act of February 12, 1867, "changing the jurisdiction of the Courts." Thereupon the plaintiff moved for judgment for want of a plea. The Court refused to allow this motion, and the plaintiff appealed.

It was agreed that if the Supreme Court should reverse his Honor's judgment, judgment should be given there for the plaintiff. There is error. See Opinion in Jacobs v. Smallwood, at this term.

PER CURIAM. Judgment here for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The writ (Debt) was issued returnable to Spring Term, 1867, and at that Term the defendant prayed to have the advantage of the Act of February 12, 1867, "changing the jurisdiction of the Courts." Thereupon the plaintiff moved for judgment for want of a plea. The Court refused to allow this motion, and the plaintiff appealed.

It was agreed that if the Supreme Court should reverse his Honor's judgment, judgment should be given there for the plaintiff. There is error. See Opinion in Jacobs v. Smallwood, at this term.

PER CURIAM. Judgment here for the plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 N.C. 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-bysaner-nc-1869.