Thomas v. Byrd

73 So. 725, 112 Miss. 692
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1916·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

While the solution of the question presented by this record is not without difficulty, we are of the opinion that the instrument here involved (which the reporter will set out in full) did not convey to any of the parties thereto any interest in the property of the others, to vest either immediately or in the future, but that the object sought to be accomplished by it was to cause whatever property each of the parties thereto might own at his death to vest, when that event should occur, in the surviving party or parties. The instrument, therefore, is testamentary in character, and can have no operation as a deed.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Byrd, 73 So. 725, 112 Miss. 692 (Mich. 1916).

73 So. 725 (Thomas v. Byrd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Conner v. Conner
119 So. 2d 240 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1960)
Peebles v. Rodgers
50 So. 2d 632 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1951)
Gaston v. Mitchell
4 So. 2d 892 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1941)
Ates v. Ates
196 So. 243 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1940)
Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Murphy
71 P.2d 6 (Washington Supreme Court, 1937)
Taylor v. Raby
168 So. 59 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1936)
Knight v. Knight
97 So. 481 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1923)
Kelly v. Covington
81 So. 485 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1919)
Cox v. Reed
74 So. 330 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1917)