Thomas v. . Butler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Thomas v. . Butler

124 S.E. 925, 188 N.C. 818, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 193

DecidedSeptember 24, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 124 S.E. 925 (Thomas v. . Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. . Butler, 124 S.E. 925, 188 N.C. 818, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 193 (N.C. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Oueiam.

Several serious exceptions are entered on the record, but a careful perusal of the whole ease confirms us in the belief that substantial justice has been done without violence to any legal principal. Therefore, the judgment rendered by the Superior Court will be affirmed. The appeal presents no new or novel point of law which would seem to warrant an extended discussion, or which we apprehend would be helpful to the profession. No reversible error having been made to appear, the verdict and judgment will be sustained.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Oueiam.

Several serious exceptions are entered on the record, but a careful perusal of the whole ease confirms us in the belief that substantial justice has been done without violence to any legal principal. Therefore, the judgment rendered by the Superior Court will be affirmed. The appeal presents no new or novel point of law which would seem to warrant an extended discussion, or which we apprehend would be helpful to the profession. No reversible error having been made to appear, the verdict and judgment will be sustained.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 S.E. 925, 188 N.C. 818, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-butler-nc-1924.