Thomas v. . Bus Line
This text of 139 S.E. 926 (Thomas v. . Bus Line) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record presents an issue of fact and no more- The plaintiff’s testimony tends to show negligence on the part of defendant. The evidence of defendant tends to show contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff.
The charge of the court is not included in the record, and therefore it is presumed that the trial judge properly instructed the jury upon each and every phase of the law applicable to the facts. In this situation the jury was the sole arbiter.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 S.E. 926, 194 N.C. 798, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-bus-line-nc-1927.