Thomas v. . Bus Line

139 S.E. 926, 194 N.C. 798, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 232
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 19, 1927·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record presents an issue of fact and no more- The plaintiff’s testimony tends to show negligence on the part of defendant. The evidence of defendant tends to show contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff.

The charge of the court is not included in the record, and therefore it is presumed that the trial judge properly instructed the jury upon each and every phase of the law applicable to the facts. In this situation the jury was the sole arbiter.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. . Bus Line, 139 S.E. 926, 194 N.C. 798, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 232 (N.C. 1927).

139 S.E. 926 (Thomas v. . Bus Line) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . McClure
169 S.E. 809 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)