Thomas v. Burford
363 U.S. 822
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 13, 1960
DocketNo. 905
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 363 U.S. 822 (Thomas v. Burford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thomas v. Burford, 363 U.S. 822 (1960).
Opinion
The motion to substitute M. J. Wiman as the party respondent in place of C. P. Burford is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ex parte Hornbuckle
179 So. 2d 749 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1965)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
363 U.S. 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-burford-scotus-1960.