Thomas v. Brown

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 22, 2005
• Docket: 05-1195
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1195

JANIE THOMAS,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RUSSELL BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 05-1417

No. 05-1439

versus RUSSELL BROWN,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-03-3846-2-23-PMD)

Submitted: October 26, 2005 Decided: November 22, 2005

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Russell Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Fleet Freeman, FREEMAN & FREEMAN, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina; Richard Allan Hricik, THE LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD A. HRICIK, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Russell Brown appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting

summary judgment to plaintiff, and the district court’s subsequent

orders entering judgment on the jury’s verdict on damages, granting

plaintiff’s motions to strike his interlocutory notices of appeal,

and denying his motion and amended motion for stay of execution of

the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Thomas v. Brown, No. CA-03-3846-2-23-PMD

(D.S.C. Mar. 4, 11 & 15, 2005; Apr. 6, 2005). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -