Thomas v. Brevoort Savings Bank
This text of 275 A.D.2d 724 (Thomas v. Brevoort Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence was sufficient not only to sustain the finding that the deposit in trust for respondent Mabel Thomas, etc., was not an illusory transfer, but also to establish that the trust had become irrevocable before the death of appellant’s intestate, as a consequence of the delivery of the savings bank passbook to said respondent, with intent to complete the gift. (Matter of Totten, 179 N. Y. 112; Stockert v. Dry Dock Sav. Inst., 155 App. Div. 123; Davlin v. Title Guar. & Trust Co., 229 App. Div. 269; Tibbitts v. Zink, 231 App. Div. 339.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 A.D.2d 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-brevoort-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1949.