Thomas v. BRATON
This text of 232 S.W.3d 718 (Thomas v. BRATON) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Christine Thomas and the children of her son, Sedrick Thomas, deceased, appeal the amended judgment entered after a jury trial in favor of Dr. K. Steven Braton and the Highland Medical Group on their wrongful death suit. In her sole point of error, Thomas claims the trial court clearly erred in overruling her Batson challenge to the peremptory strike of an African-American venireperson. This court holds that the trial court did not err in allowing the strike in that Thomas did not show that defense counsel’s reason for the strike was pretextual and that the strike was racially motivated. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 S.W.3d 718, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1278, 2007 WL 2702179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-braton-moctapp-2007.