Thomas v. Board of Supervisors

Mississippi Supreme Court

Thomas v. Board of Supervisors

69 Miss. 665

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1892·Published

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The copy of the appointment of an overseer of the road, provided for by § 835 of the code of 1880, is not a “writ” within the meaning of § 447, and no fee is allowed for entering and returning these copies. The last clause of § 447 was to preclude any charge for delivering copies of appointments of overseers of roads under the language immediately preceding.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The copy of the appointment of an overseer of the road, provided for by § 835 of the code of 1880, is not a “writ” within the meaning of § 447, and no fee is allowed for entering and returning these copies. The last clause of § 447 was to preclude any charge for delivering copies of appointments of overseers of roads under the language immediately preceding.

Affirmed.

Thomas v. Board of Supervisors, 69 Miss. 665 (Mich. 1892).

Pincite

69 Miss. 665 (Thomas v. Board of Supervisors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.