Thomas v. Blair
196 U.S. 637, 25 S. Ct. 797, 49 L. Ed. 630, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 937
This text of 196 U.S. 637 (Thomas v. Blair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thomas v. Blair, 196 U.S. 637, 25 S. Ct. 797, 49 L. Ed. 630, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 937 (1905).
Opinion
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Marrow v. Brinkley, 129 U. S. 178; Israel v. Arthur, 152 U. S. 355, 362; Central Land Company v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103, 112; Harrison v. Morton, 171 U. S. 38; Pierce v. Somerset Railway, 171 U. S. 641.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Marrow v. Brinkley
129 U.S. 178 (Supreme Court, 1889)
Israel v. Arthur
152 U.S. 355 (Supreme Court, 1894)
Central Land Company v. Laidley
159 U.S. 103 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Harrison v. Morton
171 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 1898)
Pierce v. Somerset Railway
171 U.S. 641 (Supreme Court, 1898)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
196 U.S. 637, 25 S. Ct. 797, 49 L. Ed. 630, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-blair-scotus-1905.