Thomas v. Bell

Fourth Circuit

Thomas v. Bell

460 F. App'x 213

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 23, 2011·No. No. 11-7009·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Titus Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying Thomas’ motion for a preliminary injunction in his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Bell, No. 1:08-cv-02156-AW (D.Md. July 26, 2011). We [214]*214dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Titus Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying Thomas’ motion for a preliminary injunction in his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Bell, No. 1:08-cv-02156-AW (D.Md. July 26, 2011). We [214]*214dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Thomas v. Bell, 460 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

460 F. App'x 213 (Thomas v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.