Thomas v. Attorney Grievance Commission
744 N.W.2d 161, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 313, 2008 WL 435289
This text of 744 N.W.2d 161 (Thomas v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thomas v. Attorney Grievance Commission, 744 N.W.2d 161, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 313, 2008 WL 435289 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
Jimmy L. THOMAS, Plaintiff,
v.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
744 N.W.2d 161, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 313, 2008 WL 435289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2008.