Home/Supreme Court/Thomas v. American Brand, Inc.

Thomas v. American Brand, Inc.

526 U.S. 1026, 119 S. Ct. 1268, 143 L. Ed. 2d 363, 67 U.S.L.W. 3586, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 2018
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 22, 1999
DocketNo. 98-7735
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 526 U.S. 1026 (Thomas v. American Brand, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. American Brand, Inc., 526 U.S. 1026, 119 S. Ct. 1268, 143 L. Ed. 2d 363, 67 U.S.L.W. 3586, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 2018 (1999).

Opinion

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marciniszyn v. Board of Education
230 Conn. App. 592 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2025)
Kennedy ex rel. Kennedy v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
99 Fed. Cl. 535 (Federal Claims, 2011)
COLUMBIA PARK GOLF v. City of Kennewick
248 P.3d 1067 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2011)
L.A. v. Granby Board of Education
227 F. App'x 47 (Second Circuit, 2007)
K C Tindall, in the Matter of Appeal of Vermont Special Education Due Process Case No. 99-12 K.T., Parent and Next Friend of Kyle Tindall, Dianne Tindall, in the Matter of Appeal of Vermont Special Education Due Process Case No. 99-12 K.T., Parent and Next Friend of Kyle Tindall v. Poultney High School District, Rutland Southwest Supervisory Union, Vermont Department of Education, Poultney High School District, Rutland Southwest Supervisory Union, Counter-Claimants v. Dianne Tindall, K C Tindall, Counterclaim-Defendants. Vermont Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services, Movant
414 F.3d 281 (Second Circuit, 2005)
Tindall v. Poultney High School District
414 F.3d 281 (Second Circuit, 2005)
Rivers v. McLeod
252 F.3d 99 (Second Circuit, 2001)
Lipsman v. New York City Board of Education
13 F. App'x 13 (Second Circuit, 2000)
Harris v. Apfel
209 F.3d 413 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
" BD" v. DeBuono
130 F. Supp. 2d 401 (S.D. New York, 2000)
Maldonado Ex Rel. Maldonado v. Apfel
55 F. Supp. 2d 296 (S.D. New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
526 U.S. 1026, 119 S. Ct. 1268, 143 L. Ed. 2d 363, 67 U.S.L.W. 3586, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 2018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-american-brand-inc-scotus-1999.