Thomas v. Allgood

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6105

TITUS THOMAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OFFICER ALLGOOD; OFFICER VINE; GEORGE GREGORY, Hearing Officer; CCMS WILLIS; OFFICER HAWKINS; OFFICER ROBE; OFFICER JEROME; SGT. SMITH; SGT. OLIVER; OFFICER K. BROWN; SGT. D. ANDERSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:10-cv-03134-AW)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Titus Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Titus Thomas appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil

rights complaint for failing to comply with the court’s earlier

order requiring him to particularize and amend his complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Thomas v. Allgood, No. 8:10-cv-03134-AW (D. Md.

Dec. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED