Thomas Supply & Equipment Co. v. White Fathers of Africa, Inc.
This text of 53 A.D.2d 607 (Thomas Supply & Equipment Co. v. White Fathers of Africa, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action inter alia to recover damages for fraud, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 17, 1975, which denied its motion to disqualify plaintiff’s counsel. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. While plaintiff’s attorney should not have undertaken the representation of the plaintiff in the first instance (see Rotante v Lawrence Hosp., 46 AD2d 199; Emle Ind. v Patentex, Inc., 478 F2d 562), defendant’s inordinate delay in seeking the disqualification of the attorney bars it from obtaining that relief. To grant the application now would only serve to delay the litigation on the very eve of trial (cf. Magjuka v Greenberger, 46 AD2d 867; Matter of Huie [Gottfried], 2 AD2d 163, 165). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 A.D.2d 607, 383 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-supply-equipment-co-v-white-fathers-of-africa-inc-nyappdiv-1976.