Thomas Roy Martin v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 6, 2015
• Docket: 14-15-00402-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

AU.9TTM ,Tfi-JhW 7^//-a3^^rtITA^ I SW^?^EALS | ^.^ <^ , AUG 06 2015 To IjUo^ TfirS Ct>«L£rn.i. J CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

*f -JW tUcOb Cjo^JvT^^ ^-^v^^T^^ Q-^cT" ^2 Cn^ ^ ^^^ ^ ^ ^

©r wmn©^©^ pertav*^ "Vo ^t inJ before. *r cefta. 7Z* e#«r/ /*s ^,/ ^ ^e^^/n^ g^s aT /^ /"«/ tfftnfCriph }0 /£*/ >T £«„ £/<» ,/vy 6.M4a( mM ir+occ) Ar t^cvJ ccaO/tS- Jm-£c/~ /"/«.«/ A? Jo «~y OircCT Appia' by ^e,t*ory 0£C&u$<_ /Ay ^n^e „<£,/ *,W« **>«- tc»0/)» ©r^c

ak AffuJ Ic^yer c*J /& eW cU* for /&. fipnjLA Sn'tf +° ^ fr/tJ ***.*, ~X«/y/}M*~

U*** H^ DrsldJ'^h^OC^cyi ^e^f^C^^VAe., $c» $A. j^ov~>5 /^/ ru»r oJy fi)rc) $a„««Mc, j

aof CciwtclV sJU Uuydf iti&) k i><- &to*** 6r^. &- i^»^s V^./ &~«„A& Jz«tc// fkM~'

^m.c)^6 ^d|0** «f ^£-^- or fl)tv^ &«vc) o^(4cf TW- 4/icl, tistfyM>«* fde,f X^K /k/V /J «///>! i/c,^ ^"^ ^-"^^ "^o*^ (jbccxM thy'y} far Jo i^y /r*k/. /^t UeJ^ av 4.t//&i5 feh* /v\aA_ a r^otktocy of tfu. l«sn\c $yfh+i a*.JrfUb+>.

3oo/ 3. £WA< RECEIVED

3fT AJ/„„ 7*.; r~„M.' JUN 112015 p.hifi! Disciplinary Counsel^, State Bar or ib^

-X- »r:/,\^ fd.5 £,+n/ sr»yo/*:~i/ y«./n

fj,\ /,;c/ Court ^T ^s frC,*Jy Jrr^S** /^ / &r Jpy . d«

ft) k^^ly ~;dU/ *u;X»„ ~,~// /zL ,\aJ& d;A &A &*ny,y *J { ** •— (; c^- W~ t i_ - •

j%j fc,n«f*«*J ^ P'o^-^r/**,.* L*;.£,«j*rs & fi'^e £A* ^/,-^nnyy- _

&^Qf* .t»j A*/- tf^acru/.tk rres- , •- r>)&A,AU/y *Ht>~*J &- ~*'*-L~si>* &p«yrr Muhk/v*

c ^//^s ^J~ JL/Z*/- ke,* Jt\,L*,rJ ^ #*- e)c£*U _

j; ^,e; -S^,^.. Y-J Ule^l-

^,M,;i. ,Tx. 78I0X ES-0085-01-07 J 7&~» 9- M*ck sam fimoma tx m> RIO GRAflOE DISTRICT 09 3UH 2D15 PM 1.1 •J I CtL. 2 t-f I r •State Bar of Texas ?S7 i x 3*28 .-87 l•,,HM|.,.^||H•l«l|H|•u|'l»^|| |l:ll•rt4H•irf,•»fi,{,,,,,^fl, is / WcrLJ „^h C~$-2ol$~ $2^*/_aW