Thomas Rea v. Wal-Mart Store 1105

419 F. App'x 700

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Rea appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his disability-discrimination action. After careful de novo review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we conclude that summary judgment was proper. The undisputed evidence showed neither an adverse employment action, see Fenney v. Dakota, Minn. & E. R.R. Co., 327 F.3d 707, 711-12 (8th Cir.2003) (elements for prima facie case of failure-to-accommodate claim under Amer icans with Disabilities Act), nor retaliation, see Littleton v. Pilot Travel Ctrs., LLC, 568 F.3d 641, 644 (8th Cir.2009).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1 . The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.