Thomas Rea v. Wal-Mart Store 1105

419 F. App'x 700
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 29, 2011
Docket10-3103
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 419 F. App'x 700 (Thomas Rea v. Wal-Mart Store 1105) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas Rea v. Wal-Mart Store 1105, 419 F. App'x 700 (8th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Rea appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his disability-discrimination action. After careful de novo review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we conclude that summary judgment was proper. The undisputed evidence showed neither an adverse employment action, see Fenney v. Dakota, Minn. & E. R.R. Co., 327 F.3d 707, 711-12 (8th Cir.2003) (elements for prima facie case of failure-to-accommodate claim under Amer *701 icans with Disabilities Act), nor retaliation, see Littleton v. Pilot Travel Ctrs., LLC, 568 F.3d 641, 644 (8th Cir.2009).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rea v. Wal-Mart Store 1105
181 L. Ed. 2d 266 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
419 F. App'x 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-rea-v-wal-mart-store-1105-ca8-2011.