Thomas Ramage and Elizabeth Burkhardt v. Sugar Branch Condominium Association, Ramon L. Solano, Glenda Martinez, Elia Salina, Annie Butler, C.J. Herms

Opinion

Order filed December 13, 2016

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-16-00066-CV ____________

THOMAS RAMAGE AND ELIZABETH BURKHARDT, Appellants

V.

SUGAR BRANCH CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, RAMON L. SOLANO, GLENDA MARTINEZ, ELIA SALINA, ANNIE BUTLER, C.J. HERMS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 113th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015-31884

ORDER

The clerk’s record1 was filed February 19, 2016. Our review has determined that relevant items have been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain the notice of expedited de novo appeal; the

1 Although designated as the Clerk’s Record, it was filed in this court as a “1st Supplemental Clerk’s Record.” order of partial non-suit signed January 12, 2016; the notice of non-suit without prejudice; and the order denying motion to dismiss and attorney’s fees, signed January 5, 2016.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file an Original Clerk’s Record on or before January 3, 2017, containing the notice of expedited de novo appeal; the order of partial non-suit signed January 12, 2016; the notice of non-suit without prejudice; and the order denying motion to dismiss and attorney’s fees, signed January 5, 2016.

If the omitted items are not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted items are not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM