Thomas Phillips Co. v. Dover MacHine Products, Inc.

94 N.E.2d 701, 154 Ohio St. 235, 154 Ohio St. (N.S.) 235, 43 Ohio Op. 103, 1950 Ohio LEXIS 415
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 1, 1950·No. 32024·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*236 It appearing that the judges of the court are equally-divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one judge not participating) and are for that reason unable to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of that fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, that judgment is hereby affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias and Zimmerman, JJ., concur. Faught, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas Phillips Co. v. Dover MacHine Products, Inc., 94 N.E.2d 701, 154 Ohio St. 235, 154 Ohio St. (N.S.) 235, 43 Ohio Op. 103, 1950 Ohio LEXIS 415 (Ohio 1950).

94 N.E.2d 701 (Thomas Phillips Co. v. Dover MacHine Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Greenberg v. LEE
248 P.2d 324 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1952)