Thomas Perez v. El Pato, Inc.

Eighth Circuit

Thomas Perez v. El Pato, Inc.

608 F. App'x 439

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJuly 8, 2015

Docket14-3691

StatusUnpublished

This text of 608 F. App'x 439 (Thomas Perez v. El Pato, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas Perez v. El Pato, Inc., 608 F. App'x 439 (8th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an adverse adjudication of civil contempt made by the district court 1 in Fair Labor Standards *440 Act proceedings first initiated more than a decade ago by the Secretary of the United States Department of Labor against El Pato, Inc., doing business as El Maguey Corporation, Inc.; JYR’s El Maguey Corporation, Inc., doing business as El Ma-guey Mexican Restaurant; El Sapo, Inc., doing business as El Maguey Restaurant; Manuel Jaime; Humberto Jaime; and Jus-to Adán. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See F.T.C. v. Neiswonger, 580 F.3d 769, 773 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an adverse adjudication of civil contempt made by the district court 1 in Fair Labor Standards *440 Act proceedings first initiated more than a decade ago by the Secretary of the United States Department of Labor against El Pato, Inc., doing business as El Maguey Corporation, Inc.; JYR’s El Maguey Corporation, Inc., doing business as El Ma-guey Mexican Restaurant; El Sapo, Inc., doing business as El Maguey Restaurant; Manuel Jaime; Humberto Jaime; and Jus-to Adán. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See F.T.C. v. Neiswonger, 580 F.3d 769, 773 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

608 F. App'x 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-perez-v-el-pato-inc-ca8-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack