Thomas Paul Wooten v. State
Opinion
NO. 07-12-0367-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
FEBRUARY 20, 2013
MICHAEL GUTIERREZ,
Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 54,842-E; HON. DOUGLAS R. WOODBURN, PRESIDING
Memorandum Opinion
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
Appellant, Michael Gutierrez, appeals the trial court’s judgment wherein he was assessed attorney’s fees. The State concedes that an assessment of such fees would be improper. We modify the judgment and affirm as modified.
The judgment contains the following provision: “The Court ORDERS Defendant to pay all fines, court costs, and restitution as indicated in attached Bill of Cost.” Furthermore, the bill of costs includes an amount related to attorney's fees. Given the
issue and the State's concession, we modify the judgment and remove all reference to appellant paying any attorney's fees whether or not mentioned in the Bill of Costs.
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, as modified.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas Paul Wooten v. State (Thomas Paul Wooten v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.