Thomas Paul Wooten v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 20, 2013·No. 07-11-00456-CR·Published

Opinion

NO. 07-12-0367-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

FEBRUARY 20, 2013 ___________________________________

MICHAEL GUTIERREZ,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee __________________________________

FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 54,842-E; HON. DOUGLAS R. WOODBURN, PRESIDING __________________________________

Memorandum Opinion __________________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Appellant, Michael Gutierrez, appeals the trial court’s judgment wherein he was

assessed attorney’s fees. The State concedes that an assessment of such fees would

be improper. We modify the judgment and affirm as modified.

The judgment contains the following provision: “The Court ORDERS Defendant

to pay all fines, court costs, and restitution as indicated in attached Bill of Cost.”

Furthermore, the bill of costs includes an amount related to attorney's fees. Given the issue and the State's concession, we modify the judgment and remove all reference to

appellant paying any attorney's fees whether or not mentioned in the Bill of Costs.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, as modified.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas Paul Wooten v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Thomas Paul Wooten v. State (Thomas Paul Wooten v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.