Thomas Paul Gilbert v. State
This text of Thomas Paul Gilbert v. State (Thomas Paul Gilbert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered April 11, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01072-CR
THOMAS PAUL GILBERT, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219-80015-2018
ORDER
Appellant’s brief was initially due January 27, 2019. Appellant subsequently filed two
motions for extensions of time which we granted, making his brief due March 28, 2019. To date,
appellant’s brief has not been filed, and appellant has had no communication with the Court
regarding the brief or the appeal.
Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s
brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and
recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal or whether
appellant has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain
appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per
curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be
necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this
order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Jennifer Edgeworth,
Presiding Judge, 219th Judicial District Court; Mitchell Nolte; and to the Collin County District
Attorney.
This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are
received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thomas Paul Gilbert v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-paul-gilbert-v-state-texapp-2019.