Thomas Patrick Keegan v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Thomas Patrick Keegan v. United States

428 F.2d 824

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 6, 1970

Docket24691

StatusPublished

This text of 428 F.2d 824 (Thomas Patrick Keegan v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas Patrick Keegan v. United States, 428 F.2d 824 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The petitioner in this 2255 proceeding asserted that at the time of his trial he was entitled to a psychiatric examination. Apparently no one raised this question prior to this proceeding. In this proceeding the petitioner was given a full hearing and the Court on the evidence presented denied the petition. There was evidence to support his judgment of dismissal, which is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The petitioner in this 2255 proceeding asserted that at the time of his trial he was entitled to a psychiatric examination. Apparently no one raised this question prior to this proceeding. In this proceeding the petitioner was given a full hearing and the Court on the evidence presented denied the petition. There was evidence to support his judgment of dismissal, which is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

428 F.2d 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-patrick-keegan-v-united-states-ca9-1970.