Thomas Patrick Keegan v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Thomas Patrick Keegan v. United States

428 F.2d 824

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas Patrick Keegan v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 385 F.2d 260 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 6, 1970·No. 24691·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The petitioner in this 2255 proceeding asserted that at the time of his trial he was entitled to a psychiatric examination. Apparently no one raised this question prior to this proceeding. In this proceeding the petitioner was given a full hearing and the Court on the evidence presented denied the petition. There was evidence to support his judgment of dismissal, which is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The petitioner in this 2255 proceeding asserted that at the time of his trial he was entitled to a psychiatric examination. Apparently no one raised this question prior to this proceeding. In this proceeding the petitioner was given a full hearing and the Court on the evidence presented denied the petition. There was evidence to support his judgment of dismissal, which is affirmed.

Thomas Patrick Keegan v. United States, 428 F.2d 824 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

428 F.2d 824 (Thomas Patrick Keegan v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.